<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bay Area Community Exchange &#187; patelco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sfbace.org/tag/patelco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sfbace.org</link>
	<description>a collaborative network supporting alternative means of exchange</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Why do CUs oppose ‘Reasonable Fees’ in card payment amendment</title>
		<link>http://lebleu.org/blog/2010/06/08/why-do-cus-oppose-reasonable-fees-in-card-payment-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://lebleu.org/blog/2010/06/08/why-do-cus-oppose-reasonable-fees-in-card-payment-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume Lebleu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patelco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lebleu.org/blog/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago, Patelco sent the letter below to their members asking them to voice their opinion against the REASONABLE FEES AND RULES FOR PAYMENT CARD TRANSACTIONS amendment (original text). This campaign seems to be orchestrated at the state and national level.
What is not clear to me is why would Patelco, a credit union [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lebleu.org/blog/2010/06/08/why-do-cus-oppose-reasonable-fees-in-card-payment-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

