BACE Timebank Rotating Header Image

ARTICLES

“What am I, some kind of elitist?” On becoming a BACE board member by Amber

In 2009 my relationship with Bay Area Community Exchange began when I made a video about the grassroots (or solidarity) economy. (In fact, you can watch it here!) It earned me about 50 hours on the time bank and I was off and running.

Not only was I ready with hours, I was ready with knowledge that was new to me. Interviewing the organizers of the Grassroots Economics Festival gave me a lot to think about, as far as what is possible outside the mainstream economy.

After becoming a mother, I looked to the time bank for a model to find access to childcare, for one thing. Then I started volunteering with BACE to make sure that the needs of families and kids were considered in planning events, such as POSSE Parties.

My ideas and energy were well-received. It felt great! I’ve worked a lot of jobs where ideas were shot down by bosses who weren’t paying me to think, so they said. BACE is a collective, so that means board members, volunteers, and active time bank users decide what the priorities are. (One challenge with that, of course, is that we often find our long list of ideas limited by our own schedules, resources, and ability to follow through.)

I actively volunteered for over 2 years before nominating myself to become a board member (the standard procedure in joining the board). My hesitance was that as a white lady, joining a board with an already white majority reflected the toxic alignment of power that keeps people of color on the outskirts of not only the mainstream economy but also some “alternative” and supposedly “progressive” movements as well. This remains in the front of my mind.

I also felt that a board, by its very nature, is an elite power structure. Comfortable in staying outside of it, I participated at arm’s-length by doing the work I felt suited for, attending meetings, and exercising my vote. I kept reading about collectives and non-hierarchical organizing structures to learn more. (For example and its counterpoint offered a “second-wave” feminist take on the subject.)

But then the board membership began to shrink, and I saw that my presence was indeed needed—that as a parent, a youth development worker, a feminist, an artist, a skeptic, and a voracious reader of anti-racist analysis, I might be able to make a meaningful impact within and through BACE.

I also saw that whether or not my power was explicitly stated as a board member or implicitly exercised as an extremely active volunteer, it was still power. Naming it and using it responsibly felt better than acting like it was non-existent or somehow not accountable to anyone.

So last month, the attendees of the planning meeting in Oakland went ahead and voted me as a board member. Yay! I’m planning to occupy the seat for 6 months, and during that time I want to hit some goals.

We definitely have our work cut out for us with upcoming website changes, continuing relationships with community organizations, volunteer outreach, and the return of POSSE parties. (Can’t wait for more of those!) We are also working as a board to provide curriculum to use in the community, and trainings for people interested in becoming board members—learning new leadership skills, and sharing theirs with us.

And I would love to talk and work more deeply with people in uprooting structural racism, sexism, ableism, and intersections of oppression, and connecting economic justice work like time banking, for example, to these efforts. What are the benefits of time banking as a solution to inequality? What are the risks? How does it look different in our differing communities? What are the challenges? What other models of mutual aid can we learn from?

Please feel free to email amber@bace.org if you have some thoughts to share, or call me at 415-699-7011. I will do my best to answer in a timely way.

Power, freedom, survival, and consciousness to the people!

Meetings Relocated

Until April 2013, all BACE general meetings were held at Noisebridge on the second Wednesday of every month. Starting then, if you were watching the sidebar on the homepage, you may have noticed a change. April’s meeting was held at the Sudo Room in Oakland instead. May’s meeting will be held back at Noisebridge, June’s at the Sudo Room, and so on.

Currently, we are holding the general meeting at the Sudo Room in even numbered months and at Noisebridge in odd numbered months. The plan is to continue this arrangement for six months, then re-evaluate it and determine if we should continue to alternate meeting locations between Noisebridge and the Sudo Room or choose another arrangement.

The decision to alternate meeting spaces was made largely so that we could better accommodate both San Francisco and East Bay members. Wherever we hold our meetings, we realize that some people will have to cross the bay, that some who would be able to attend at Noisebridge can’t make it to the Sudo Room, and vice versa. On the plus side, alternating meeting spaces allows a greater range of people to attend the meetings, even if it means that some can no longer do so every month.

All general meetings are open to all BACE members, and all meeting attendees are welcome to make proposals and to vote on them. If you have an opinion on this or any other Timebank issue, please come to a meeting and make your voice heard! And if you cannot attend a meeting, you are welcome to email your thoughts, questions, and suggestions to support@bace.org.

Students from the Woolman Semester School visit BACE Timebank

This is a guest post by Megan Stoddard, an active BACE member: On Thursday, March 18th, BACE was honored with a visit from students of the Woolman Semester School. This alternative residential high school in Nevada City, California takes high school juniors and seniors, and gap year students, for semester-long programs focusing on social and environmental justice. This was the second time Woolman students visited BACE. Their first visit, by last semester’s group of students, took place in November 2012.

Our guests were at the tail end of their Great Turning field trip, which is part of the Global Issues class taught by Emily Ziont. This trip brought them to the Bay Area for a tour of groups, projects, and programs that offer solutions to immediately pressing global issues. In BACE presentation by volunteers Ricardo Simon, Amber Yada, and Megan Stoddard, held at Noisebridge, the students gained exposure to a whole new economic model.

Questions flew. Students and staff alike were very curious about how all of this works.

Question: How do you prevent people from freeloading and taking advantage of the system?

Answer: People wouldn’t want to work for freeloaders, so that takes care of itself, and we’ve never had that problem–people tend to feel obligated to give services when they’ve received services.

Question:  What if I’m a new Timebank member and I need a service before I’ve done any work?

Answer: Then you have a negative balance, and that’s okay–there’s no penalty for having given more credits than you’ve received.

Question: Is there a limit to how many credits you can have (above or below zero)?

Answer: Not really–if someone has more than fifty credits either way, we may contact them to make sure they know how to use the system, because what we really want is for people to be both giving and receiving–but again, we’ve never had any problems.

Question: Are there timebanks in other places (i.e. this student’s hometown, Asheville, North Carolina)?

Answer: Yes, and you should be able to find them with an Internet search. There’s also a timebank for college students, which probably all of you will be soon.

In the spirit of spreading the word, Woolman students Lily Bell and Augie Brinker have posted articles on the school’s blog about the Timebank presentation. (Slight correction to the article by Lilly Bell: Megan, Amber, and Rick are not the founders of BACE, just the volunteers who could make it that day.)

Guest Post: February BACE Retreat Reflections

This is a guest post by Jenny Greenwood, an active BACE member:

The February BACE Timebank retreat was my first Timebank meeting. The small room got quite full of people over the course of the day. After introductions and some discussion of cooperative principles and the need for a respectful, constructive conversation, we proceeded to have one, along with a refreshing, meditative, exercise circle in the garden and an excellent potluck lunch.Click here to see the meeting notes and here to see pictures of the whiteboard.  

I enjoyed meeting other Timebank members and found it interesting and worthwhile to get an overview of the range of issues facing the Timebank. Once we adopted the approach of advancing toward setting an agenda by listing on the whiteboard specific problems needing solutions, things moved efficiently, and the final discussion of the three top priority issues for 45 minutes or less each felt very productive. By the time we started on the third urgent issue, though, I heard some people express the understandable desire to just forget about it and end the meeting, as it was now late afternoon.

It’s hard to have a specific agenda already in place on the morning of a Timebank retreat, because there’s no telling who is coming or what their concerns are. On the other hand, having a procedure for setting an agenda quickly at the start of the meeting would free up time for more progress on more issues during the day. Perhaps before a retreat announcement, the Timebank might send out an email titled something like “All Members: Take a quick survey to help set the BACE retreat agenda!” and ask questions such as, “What issues do you want addressed at the upcoming BACE retreat? What specifically is not working in your experience of the Timebank? What is working? What should we keep doing and what needs fixing? Take the survey even if you can’t attend the retreat!” The questions could sit right at the top of the email where even casual readers would see them.

The basis for the survey could be the list, seen in a February retreat whiteboard photo, of things not presently working. The list would be reviewed and edited for current applicability at a BACE meeting shortly before the sending of the email. Using an online survey would avoid the burden of having to sort through lots of emailed responses. Members could be asked to prioritize the listed issues (the computer would tally responses) and add other thoughts or concerns as desired (someone would have to print these out, go through them to see what categories they fell into, and bring them to the meeting). This would make it simple for members to get involved even if they didn’t plan to attend – and getting people a little bit involved can sometimes be a step toward getting them to participate more – maybe they might even decide to come to the retreat after all!

Alternatively, if creating an online survey were an unrealistic amount of work, the agenda creation email could simply ask everyone planning to attend the meeting to think about and write down their numbered prioritization of the listed issues, together with any issues they might wish to add, and bring their responses to the meeting. In either case, the overall prioritization could go up on the whiteboard early in the day to set the agenda.

On a different topic – the house where the recent retreat took place worked well as a venue, but should more people attend in future, a bigger room would be needed. It might be helpful to consider using meeting rooms at a public place like a library. The main branch of the Berkeley public library, for example, located only two blocks from downtown Berkeley BART, has meeting rooms open to community organizations with operations in Berkeley. Wherever future retreats may take place, notices advertising them could be submitted for posting on library bulletin boards around the Bay Area a few weeks beforehand so that more people discover the Timebank and decide to attend. For similar reasons, the Timebank might ask that notices about retreats go out in the event announcement mailings of groups like Transition Berkeley and Transition SF.

All in all, I found the February retreat enjoyable and worthwhile. I’m looking forward to the next one!

Guest post: Timebank Confidential

This is a guest post by Megan Stoddard, an active BACE member:

It’s another day on Timebank, and the sidebar is humming with activity (note – it’s down now, but hopefully will be up soon). Tina earned one hour from Rob for “changing the oil in my car.” Mary, whose profile shows that she is a CPA, earned one hour from Jane for tax advice. And Joe, whose profile indicates that he is a psychotherapist, and who offers psychotherapy and no other service on Timebank, earned one hour from Andrea for psychotherapy. A look at Joe’s profile, or at Andrea’s, shows that she has credited him an hour for psychotherapy every week for the last two months.

Because Andrea has paid her therapist in Timebank credit rather than dollars, the fact that she has been receiving therapy is now public information. It will appear in the sidebar until other transactions push it off, and it will appear in her profile, and in Joe’s, as long as the site exists. On Timebank, there is no way to hide a transaction. There is no way to make a transaction confidential. Users cannot remove past transactions from their profiles. That information is available to all Timebank users, now and forever.

Yet under almost all circumstances, confidentiality laws prevent Joe from telling anyone at all that he’s seen Andrea as a client unless she gives consent, explicitly and in writing. Even the circumstances in which Joe could divulge that information to someone else would not allow him to make that information public. And under normal circumstances, Andrea would not have to make that information public in order to pay Joe.

If she wrote him a check, the bank(s) that processed the check would have to keep all transactions confidential. If her therapy were paid for by health insurance, the health insurance company would also be bound by strict confidentiality laws. No one could publicly reveal that Andrea is a therapy client except Andrea herself, and no person or institution could legally force her to make that information public.

The confidentiality laws exist for good reason: making it publicly known that you are or have been a therapy client could hurt you. In Andrea’s case, a current or potential employer or business client of hers could find out through Timebank that she’s received therapy and assume that she’s mentally unstable. Or suppose she’s involved in a child custody dispute, and her ex learns through Timebank that she’s in therapy and decides to use that against her. Or it could even be that an acquaintance finds out, and while they don’t necessarily think any less of Andrea for it, she’s uncomfortable with having them know.

When it comes to preserving Andrea’s privacy, the law is on her side; traditional institutions are on her side; and the monetary economy would be on her side. But Timebank is not–at least, not as it’s currently set up.

Arguably, Timebank isn’t on Joe’s side either. At first glance, the system would seem to benefit him: he gets to promote his therapy practice and acquire new clients. If people see in the sidebar or on Joe’s profile that Joe has been receiving credits for therapy, and they themselves are seeking therapy, and perhaps unable to pay for it in dollars, they are likely to turn to Joe. However, potential clients may also be frightened away by the impossibility of keeping the transaction confidential.

The fact that Joe is providing psychotherapy does not need to be a secret. Neither does the fact that he’s seeing clients through Timebank. If those two facts are known to the Timebank community, the community benefits. But who the clients are does need to be a secret.

If Timebank provided the option of making individual transactions confidential, sensitive services such as psychotherapy–and other services that normally require the identities of clients to be kept confidential–could be given and received without compromising confidentiality. Timebank is, in fact, in the process of doing just that. The programming team is currently working on changes to the site’s coding, which will include an option to anonymize individual transactions. These changes are expected to be implemented before the end of 2013.

In the meantime, there are a few ways to work around the current setup when giving credit for a confidential service. In the following examples, we use therapy as the confidential service, but it could also be legal services or any other service that requires client confidentiality

– The therapy client could set up a separate Timebank account, with a pseudonym, to use only for crediting therapy services.

Pro: The client’s privacy would be preserved, and the therapist would still have his/her therapy practice made known to the Timebank community.

Con: If the pseudonymous account were used only for therapy transactions, the client could not earn any credits under that account. If the therapy client did any work to accrue credits under the pseudonym, his/her identity would become known to anyone he/she interacted with in the course of performing services.

– Instead of saying the credit is for therapy, the client could type something like, “Thanks for the help” when posting the credit. As a variation, the client could credit the provider for a different service entirely–gardening or computer help, for instance.

Pros: The transaction remains visible without telling the public that this person is receiving therapy, and it allows the client to keep participating in Timebank under the same account.

Cons: If the therapist is offering therapy services, as Joe is, others could put two and two together and determine that the “help” given was psychotherapy, so the client’s privacy is not really being preserved. And this solution does not give the community the benefit of knowing that psychotherapy services are being given and received.

– Instead of crediting the therapist directly, the client could credit Timebank, and Timebank could credit the therapist.

Pros: The therapist’s profile, and the sidebar, will show that he/she was credited for psychotherapy without revealing who the client was, and the client’s profile will not show that he/she credited someone for psychotherapy. Meanwhile, the client can participate fully in Timebank under the same account.

Cons: It would be impossible for the client to credit Timebank without giving a reason for the transaction, which would appear in his/her profile and the sidebar. While the client would have the option of giving a nonspecific reason–and then emailing the Timebank team to tell them to credit so-and-so for such-and-such service–the very fact that this person is crediting Timebank and not specifying the reason could make others wonder what this person has to hide. Also, doing it this way would require the client to tell the Timebank team that they’re a therapy client. While the team will keep this information confidential, it would mean about half a dozen extra people would know.

None of these solutions are perfect. The Timebank team asks the community to bear with us as we work on solving this problem. And to help keep confidential services confidential, we offer the following suggestions:

– If you have already credited someone openly for a service that you would rather keep confidential, Timebank administrators can remove the credit at your request. This will send the credit back to you. You can then re-credit the service provider in a way that conceals the nature of the service you received, or ask the Timebank team to credit him/her for you, as described above. If you would like any of your past transactions removed, please emailsupport@bace.org.

– If you have provided a confidential service through Timebank, we ask that you make a reasonable effort to contact all of your Timebank clients and make sure that they know about this issue, the possible solutions, and that it is being discussed on the site. The Timebank team has attempted to contact providers of confidential services in advance of this article being published, but we were not able to reach everyone.

– In the same vein, if you have received a confidential service through Timebank and have not heard about this from your provider, please make the effort to contact your provider, to ensure that he/she knows and can inform other clients.

– Finally, we suggest that if you are providing a confidential service, you also include other services in your profile that would not raise confidentiality issues–i.e. gardening, childcare, web design, etc. You do not necessarily have to provide those services, but having them in your profile would give your clients an out when crediting you, until anonymous transactions become possible.

Timebank users deserve no less from the alternative economy than from the monetary economy. If traditional institutions, the law, and the monetary economy all serve to preserve privacy when services of a sensitive nature are given and received, Timebank cannot afford not to do the same.

Disclaimer: The characters in this article are fictional. While they may have something in common with actual Timebank users, any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

You too can write for the BACE blog

Just a quick note to say that any member of the BACE timebank can participate on the blog. If you want to write a guest post, or even better, post regularly, just contact us at support@bace.org and we’ll get back to you with details. Post about your experiences using BACE, your goals for it, where you want it to go, or whatever else. As you can see, we can use all the participation we can get 🙂